Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02272
Original file (BC 2013 02272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02272

XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 30 Aug 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was asked to perform a FA while he was serving on Contingency Exercise Orders when he should have been exempt. 

His home unit asked him to complete the FA because his EPR was closing out and he was unaware the test was not mandatory.

He was in a deployed location and based on IAW 36-2905 para 21, he was rightfully exempt from FA test.
 
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).

On 30 Aug 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 74.40 unsatisfactory.

IAW AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program (dated 1 July 2010), AFGM 4 (dated 26 June 2012), Paragraph 21, "Airmen will automatically be considered "exempt" if they are in a deployed location on Contingency Exercise Deployment (CED) or Military Personnel Appropriation (MPA) orders in direct support of contingency and their "current" FA expires. Any Airmen deployed for less than 1 year to a location that administers FAs may complete FAs on a voluntary basis only."

The applicant did not provide evidence of his deployment nor did he provide proof that his FA was not voluntary. 

The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
30 Oct 13
32.70 
Unsatisfactory 
08 Apr 13
79.20
Satisfactory
*30 Aug 12 
74.40
Unsatisfactory
02 Nov 11
81.50
Satisfactory
25 Jul 11
62.80
Unsatisfactory
* Contested FA

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas:  Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit-ups completed within one minute each).  Military members receive a composite score on a 0 to 100 scale based on the following maximum component scores: 60 points for aerobic, 20 points for body composition, 10 points for push-ups and 10 points for sit-ups.  To determine individual composite fitness scores the Air Force uses age and gender specific fitness score charts.  An unsatisfactory is a composite score less than 75 and/or one or more component minimums are not met.

On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence; Travel voucher from deployment.” 
________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for removal of FA dated 30 Aug 12. Applicant did not provide supporting evidence to warrant removal from AFFMS. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  In this respect, we note the applicant’s submission does not contain any supporting documentation that he was deployed and did not voluntarily take the contested FA.  Should the applicant provide documentation that would demonstrate his inability to successfully complete the contested FA, we would be willing to reconsider his request.  However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02272 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Ms. XXXXXXX, Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXX, Vice Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 May 13.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 9 Dec 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14.



		XXXXXXX
		Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02087

    Original file (BC 2013 02087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The V02 in the calculation is 35.807808, when applied to the Alternate Aerobic Test Score Chart in AFI 36-2905, Atch 17, the resulting component score equals a component score of 42.3. Therefore, the AFFMS Fitness Calculator has in fact calculated applicant's score IAW AFI 36-2905. On 2 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “No evidence of impropriety, V02 calculations IAW AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02277

    Original file (BC 2013 02277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 24 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 64.40 unsatisfactory due to failure to achieve minimum requirements on the AC. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submitted; a memorandum from the FAC validating that she in fact asked for a re-tape by another...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01302

    Original file (BC 2013 01302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01302 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 09 Jan 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 09 Jan 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 70.88,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01944

    Original file (BC 2013 01944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The updated AFFMS record indicates applicant continued to achieve unsatisfactory scores due to a composite score of 69.5 on both contested FAs. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Nov 13 70.00 Unsatisfactory 29 May 13 81.5 Satisfactory 27 Jul 12 Exempt Exempt *30 May 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory *2 Mar 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board corrected the AFFMS records to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01195

    Original file (BC 2013 01195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 Feb 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and received a composite score of 68.00 resulting in an unsatisfactory fitness score. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 23 Sep 2013 88.50 Satisfactory 28 Mar 2013 94.67 Excellent *22 Feb 2013 68.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Aug 2013 88.10 Satisfactory 02 Feb 2013 100.00 Excellent * Contested FA On 15 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01174

    Original file (BC 2013 01174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01174 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 14 July 2011, 02 Feb 2012, and 31 Mar 2012 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550

    Original file (BC 2013 01550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01179

    Original file (BC-2012-01179.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ 2 THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio component of his Fitness Assessment score dated 1 February 2012, be updated to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01340

    Original file (BC 2013 01340.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 01 Apr 2013 85.00 Satisfactory 11 Oct 2012 100.00 Excellent *10 Aug 2012 81.00 Unsatisfactory 15 Feb 2012 95.75 Excellent 17 Jun 2011 86.00 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 24 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03483

    Original file (BC 2012 03483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03483 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 13 Jul 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). “Body composition (height, weight, and AC) must be the first component assessed in the FA.” While the weight is not...